Bruce J. Caldwell

Économiste

Dates

Tendance

école autrichienne

Nationalité

États-Unis

Articles internes

Autres articles sur Bruce J. Caldwell

Citation

Interwikis sur Bruce J. Caldwell

Bruce J. Caldwell est professeur d'économie à l'université de Greensboro.

Il a obtenu son doctorat d'économie en 1979, à l'université du North Carolina – Chapel Hill avec une thése sur la pensée méthodologique en économie “Recent Methodological Thought in Economics: Survey and Critique from a Philosophy of Science Perspective” sous la direction de Vincent J. Tarascio. De 1979 à 1981, il fut Professeur assistant à l'université de Greensboro avant de suivre des études post-doctorales de 1981 à 1982 à New York University. De 1982 à 1987, il est de nouveau professeur associé à l'université de Greensboro. Il obtient le titre de professeur à partir de 1987.

Il est membre du comité éditorial de nombreuses revues scientifiques et universitaires dont le "Journal of the History of Economic Thought", l'Atlantic Economic Journal, The Review of Austrian Economics, The Southern Economic Journal, The Journal of Economic Methodology, History of Political Economy, et the Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology

Il est spécialiste de l'école autrichienne notamment sur la partie méthodologique et il a fait de nombreuses recherches sur les contributions intellectuelles de Friedrich Hayek et de Karl Popper, débattant, entre autres, avec les méthodologistes poppériens comme Mark Blaug et Terence Hutchison.

Bibliographie

1979,
- a. avec Vincent J. Tarascio, Theory-Choice in Economics: Philosophy and Practice, Journal of Economic Issues, vol. 13 (décembre), pp983-1006
- b. Two Suggestions for the Improvement of Methodological Work in Economics, American Economist, vol. 23, Fall, pp56-61

1980,
- a. A Critique of Friedman’s Methodological Instrumentalism, Southern Economic Journal, vol. 47, octobre, pp366-74
- b. Positivist Philosophy of Science and the Methodology of Economics, Journal of Economic Issues, vol. 14, mars, pp53-76

1982, Beyond Positivism: Economic Methodology in the Twentieth Century. London: Allen and Unwin
- Paperback edition en 1984
- Traduction japonaise en 1988
- Réimpression en 1994 avec une nouvelle préface de l'auteur

1983, The Neoclassical Maximization Hypothesis: Comment, American Economic Review, vol. 73, septembre, pp824-827

1984,
- a. dir., Appraisal and Criticism in Economics: A Book of Readings, London: Allen and Unwin
- b. Economic Methodology in the Postpositivist Era, Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, vol 2, pp195-205
- c. Some Problems with Falsificationism in Economics, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol 14, pp489-495
- d. Praxeology and Its Critics: An Appraisal, History of Political Economy, vol 16, Fall, pp363-379
- e. avec A. W. Coats, The Rhetoric of Economics: Comment, Journal of Economic Literature, vol 22, juin, pp575-578

1985, Some Reflections on Beyond Positivism, Journal of Economic Issues, vol 19, mars, pp187-194

1986,
- a. Behavioral Economics: An Interpretive History, In: B. Gilad et S. Kaish, dir., Handbook of Behavioral Economics, vol. A, Behavioral Microeconomics. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp5-17
- b. Towards a Broader Conception of Criticism, History of Political Economy, vol 18, Winter, pp675-681

1987,
- a. Positivism, In: J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, et P. Newman, dir., The New Palgrave, vol. 3. London: Macmillan, pp921-923
- b. Hayek’s ‘The Trend of Economic Thinking, Review of Austrian Economics, vol 2, pp175-178

1988,
- a. The Case for Pluralism, In: N. de Marchi, Dir., The Popperian Legacy in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp231-244
- b. La Méthodologie de Hayek: Description, Evaluation et Interrogations, Politique et Economie, vol. 9, pp71-85
  - Repris en 1989, In: Gilles Dostaler et Diane Ethier, Dir., Friedrich Hayek: Philosophie, Economie et Politique. Paris: Economica
- c. "Hayek’s Transformation", History of Political Economy, vol 20, Winter, pp513-541
  - Repris en 1999, In: Peter Boettke, dir., The Legacy of Friedrich von Hayek, Vol. 3. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp153-181
- d. Developments in Economic Methodology with Implications for Political Science, Politics, vol 8, octobre, pp43-48

1989,
- a. The Trend of Methodological Thinking, Ricerche Economiche, vol 43 (mai-juin), pp8-20
- b. "Austrians and Institutionalists: The Historical Origins of their Shared Characteristics", Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, vol 6, pp91-100
- c. Post Keynesian Methodology: An Assessment, Review of Political Economy, vol 1, pp43-64

1990,
- a. Carl Menger and His Legacy in Economics, Dir., Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press
- b. Does Methodology Matter? How Should it Be Practiced?, Finnish Economic Papers, vol 3, Spring, pp64-71

1991,
- a. "Ludwig M. Lachmann: A Reminiscence", Critical Review, vol 5, n°1, Winter, pp139-144
- b. Has Formalization Gone Too Far in Economics?, Methodus, vol 3, juin, pp27-29
- c. Clarifying Popper, Journal of Economic Literature, vol 29, mars, pp1-33
  - Repris en 2007, In John Davis, Dir., Recent Developments in Economic Methodology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
- d. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs in Economics: Criticisms and Conjectures, In: G. K. Shaw, dir., Economics, Culture, and Éducation: Essays in Honour of Mark Blaug. London: Edward Elgar, pp95-107
- e. The Progress of Subjectivism: A Comment on Lavoie, In: Mark Blaug et Neil de Marchi, dir., Interpreting Modern Economics: Studies in the Applicability of the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. London: Edward Elgar, pp487-491

1992,
- a. avec Stephan Boehm, eds, Austrian Economics: Tensions and New Directions. Boston: Kluwer
- b. Hayek the Falsificationist? A Refutation, Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, vol 10, pp1-15
- c. Hayek the Falsificationist: Reply to Hutchison, Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, vol 10, pp33-42
- d. Friedman’s Predictivist Instrumentalism: A Modification, Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, vol 10, pp119-28
- e. “The Market as an Isolated Causal Process: A Comment on Mäki", In: Bruce Caldwell et Stephan Boehm, Dir., Austrian Economics: Tensions and New Directions. Boston: Kluwer, pp60-65
- f. “Human Molecules: A Comment on Nelson”, In: Neil de Marchi, dir., Post-Popperian Economic Methodology, Boston: Kluwer, pp135-149

1993,
- a. The Philosophy and Methodology of Economics, ed,Aldershot: Edward Elgar
- b. “Economic Methodology: Rationale, Foundations, Prospects", In: Bo Gustafsson, Christian Knudsen et Uskali Mäki, dir., Rationality, Institutions and Economic Methodology. London: Routledge, pp44-60

1994,
- a. “Hayek’s Scientific Subjectivism”, Economics and Philosophy, vol 10, n°2, octobre, pp305-313
  - Repris en 1999, In: Peter Boettke, dir., The Legacy of Friedrich von Hayek, Vol. 2. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp109-117
  - Repris en 2004, In: Massimo Egidi et Salvatore Rizzello, Cognitive Economics. Vol. 1. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp139-147
- b. “Two Proposals for the Recovery of Economic Practice”, In: R. Backhouse, dir., New Directions in Economic Methodology, London: Routledge, pp137-153
- c. “Four Theses on Hayek, In: Marina Colonna, Harald Hagemann et O. F. Hamouda, dir., Capitalism, Socialism and Knowledge: The Economics of F.A. Hayek, volume 2. Aldershot: Elgar, pp117-130

1995,
- a. dir., Contra Keynes and Cambridge: Essays and Correspondence, Volume 9, The Collected Works of F.A. Hayek. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, and London: Routledge
- b. “Marx’s Economic Theory, True or False? A Comment on Moseley”, In: F. Moseley, dir., Heterodox Economic Theory: True or False?. Aldershot: Elgar, pp119-126

1997,
- a. dir., Socialism and War, The Collected Works of F.A. Hayek, Volume 10, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, and London: Routledge
- b. Hayek and Socialism, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 35, n°4, décembre, pp1856-1890
  - Repris en 1999, In: Peter Boettke, Dir., The Legacy of Friedrich von Hayek, Vol 3, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp394-428
- c. “Varieties of Pluralism: Comment on Samuels and Dow”, In: A. Salanti et E. Screpanti, dir., Pluralism in Economics. Cheltenham, UK: Elgar, pp100-104

1998,
- a. "Why Didn’t Hayek Review Keynes’ General Theory?", History of Political Economy, vol. 30 (Winter), pp545-69
  - Extrait et repris en 2001, [1], Ama-gi, vol. 4, no. 1 (Fall), pp18-24
- b. F.A. Hayek, In: J. Davis, W. Hands et Uskali Maki, Dir., Handbook of Economic Methodology, Cheltenham, UK: Elgar, pp220-226
- c. Terence Hutchison, In: J. Davis, W. Hands et Uskali Maki, Dir., Handbook of Economic Methodology. Cheltenham, UK: Elgar, pp232-235
- d. Situational Analysis, In: J. Davis, W. Hands et Uskali Maki, Dir., Handbook of Economic Methodology. Cheltenham, UK: Elgar, pp462-468

2000, The Emergence of Hayek’s Ideas on Cultural Evolution, Review of Austrian Economics, vol. 13 (février), pp. 5-22
2001,
- a. There Really Was a German Historical School, History of Political Economy, vol. 33, no. 3 (Fall), pp649-54
- b. Hodgson on Hayek: A Critique, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 25, no. 4 (juillet), pp539-53
- c. Hayek: Right for the Wrong Reasons?, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, vol. 23, no. 2 (juin), pp141-51

2002,
- a. (http://public.econ.duke.edu/~bjc18/docs/Wieser,%20Hayek,%20and%20Equilibrium%20Theory.pdf "Wieser, Hayek and Equilibrium Theory"], Journal des économistes et des études humaines, Vol 12, n°1 (mars), pp47-66
- b. Hayek and Cultural Evolution, In: Uskali Mäki, Dir., Fact and Fiction in Economics: Models, Realism and Social Construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp285-303
2003, “Popper and Hayek: Who Influenced Whom?”, Cahier d'épistémologie, n°292
- Repris en 2007, In Ian Jarvie, Dir., Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment. London: Ashgate

2004,
- a. Hayek’s Challenge: An Intellectual Biography of F.A. Hayek. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
  - Extrait du Ch 1 repris en 2004, Ama-gi, vol. 6, no. 2 (Spring), pp16-18
  - Paperback edition en 2005
- b. "Some Reflections on F. A. Hayek’s The Sensory Order" (Quelques réflexions sur l'ordre sensoriel de Friedrich Hayek), Journal of Bioeconomics, vol 6, pp1-16
- c. Hayekian Evolution Reconsidered: A Reply to Hodgson, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 28, no. 2, pp301-305

2005,
- a. Recovering Popper: For the Left?, Critical Review, vol. 17, nos. 1-2, pp49-68
- b. The Road to Serfdom Symposium: Comments, European Journal of Political Economy, vol. 21, no. 4 (décembre), pp1054-1059
- c. Information, the Tip of the Tacit Iceberg, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 2, no. 1 (April), pp70-74
- d. Ebenstein on Hayek’s Challenge: A Comment, NYU Law Journal of Law and Liberty, vol 1, n°0, pp307-311

2006,
- a. avec Julian Reiss, "Hayek, Logic and the Naturalistic Fallacy”, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, vol. 28, n°3, septembre, pp359-370
- b. Hayek, Popper and the Thorny Question of Influence, Journal des économistes et des études humaines
- c. Hayek and the Austrian Tradition, In: Edward Feser, dir., The Cambridge Companion to Hayek, Series: Cambridge Companions to Philosophy, Cambridge, UK ; New York : Cambridge University press, Ch 1, pp13-33
- d. “Popper and Hayek: Who influenced Whom?”, In: Milford, Jarvie, et Millar, dir., Karl Popper, A Centenary Assesment, Vol. 1, Aldershot: Ashgate

2007,
- a. The Road to Serfdom: Text, Documents. Volume 2, The Collected Works of F.A. Hayek. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, and London: Routledge
- b. Life Writings: On-the-Job Training with F. A. Hayek, History of Political Economy 39(Suppl 1): 342-354
- c. Hayek and the Austrian Tradition, In: Edward Feser, Dir., The Cambridge Companion to Hayek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- d. Positivism, In: Steven Durlauf et Lawrence Blume, Dir., The New Palgrave, 2nd. ed. London: Macmillan
- e. F.A. Hayek, In: Steven Durlauf et Lawrence Blume, Dir., The New Palgrave, 2nd. ed. London: Macmillan

2009,
- a. A skirmish in the Popper Wars: Hutchison versus Caldwell on Hayek, Popper, Mises, and methodology, Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol 16, n°3, pp315–324
- b. Commentaire du livre de George Steinmetz, dir., "The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences: Positivism and Its Epistemological Others", Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol 31, n°4, pp549-550
- c. Commentaire du livre de Erik Angner, "Hayek and Natural Law", Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol 31, n°4, pp551-555
- d. Commentaire du livre de Elisabeth Nemeth, Stefan W. Schmitz et Thomas E. Uebel, dir., "Otto Neurath's Economics in Context", Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol 31, n°4, pp555-560

Littérature secondaire

1986, Eugene Rotwein, "Flirting with Apriorism: Caldwell on Mises", History of Political Economy, 18, pp669-673

1994, Theodore Burczak, "Reply to Bruce Caldwell: Can Subjectivism be Non-Hermeneutic?", Economics and Philosophy, 10:2, pp315-317
- Repris en 2000, In: Peter Boettke, dir., The Legacy of Friedrich von Hayek, Edward Elgar

1998, Karen Vaughn, commentaire du livre de Bruce Caldwell, dir., "The Collected Works of F. A. Hayek", Vol. 10: Socialism and War: Essays, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol 20, n°2, pp235-237

2004, Warren J. Samuels, Commentaire du livre de Bruce Caldwell, Hayek's Challenge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, Journal of Economic Litterature, Vol 42, juin, pp840-841

2006,
- Erik Angner, "Response to Caldwell and Reiss's “Hayek, Logic, and the Naturalistic Fallacy”", Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol 28, n°3, pp371-373
- Giampaolo Garzarelli, "Bruce Caldwell, Hayek's challenge: An intellectual biography of F.A. Hayek, European Journal of Political Economy, vol. 22(4), décembre, pp1019-1022
- Roger Koppl, Commentaire du livre de Bruce Caldwell, "Hayek’s Challenge: An Intellectual Biography of F. A. Hayek", Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 59(2), pp287-291
- Simon Marginson, Neo qualms (Commentaire du livre de Bruce Caldwell, Hayek’s Challenge: An Intellectual Biography of F.A. Hayek, Australian Book Review, juin/juillet 2006

2007, Philip E. Mirowski, “Naturalizing the Market on the Road to Revisionism: Caldwell on Hayek’s Challenge”, Journal of Institutional Economics, (3), pp351-372