Thomas Borcherding

Thomas E. Borcherding est un économiste américain, appartenant à l'école du Public Choice. Il a étudié les raisons de la croissance des dépenses publiques.

Bibliographie

• 1972, avec R. T. Deacon, The demand for the services of non-federal governments, American Economic Review, 62 (5), pp891-901

• 1977,
  • a. dir., "Budgets and Bureaucrats: The Sources of Government Growth", Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press
  • b. "One Hundred Years of Public Spending, 1870-1970", In: Thomas E. Borcherding, dir., "Budgets and Bureaucrats: The Sources of Government Growth", Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, pp19-44
  • c. "The Sources of Growth of Public Expenditures in the United States, 1902-1907", In: Thomas E. Borcherding, dir., "Budgets and Bureaucrats: The Sources of Government Growth", Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, pp45-70
  • d. avec Winston Bush, Robert M. Spann, "The Effects on Public Spending of the Divisibility of Public Outputs in Consumption, Bureaucratic Power, and the Size of the Tax-Sharing Group", In: Thomas E. Borcherding, dir.,"Budgets and Bureaucrats: The Sources of Government Growth", Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, pp211-228

• 1979, avec Jack Knetsch, "Expropriation of Private Property and the Basis for Compensation", University of Toronto Law Journal, Vol 29, pp237-252

• 1981, avec Gary W. Dorosh, "The Egg Marketing Board", Vancouver: Fraser Institute

• 1982,
  • a. "Toward a Positive Theory of Public Sector Supply Arrangements", In: R. Prichard, dir., "Public Enterprise in Canada", Toronto: Butterworth
  • b. avec B. C. Burnaby, W. W. Pommerehne, F. Schneider, "Comparing the Efficiency of Private and Public Production: The Evidence from Five Countries", Zeitschrift fur Nationalokonomie, Vol 89, pp127–156

• 1985, "The causes of government expenditure growth: a survey of the U.S. evidence", Journal of Public Economics 28 (3), pp359-382

Accédez d'un seul coup d’œil au portail économie.

Accédez d'un seul coup d’œil au portail des grands auteurs et penseurs du libéralisme.